Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc.

Submit Information

Company Name : Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc.

Stock Symbol : UNCY

Class Period : December 29, 2025 and June 29, 2026

16 Days Left Lead Plaintiff Deadline: November 2, 2026
Background

Submit Your Information

If you suffered a loss on your Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc. investments or would like to inquire about joining an action to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, please complete the form below. Please note that submission of this form does not by itself form an attorney-client relationship nor does filing out this form mean you have joined any lawsuit.










    Are you a current or former employee of the company?*
    YesNo

    Purchases

    +Additional Purchases

    Sales

    +Additional Sales

    What Happened?

    On June 30, 2026, before the market opened, Unicycive disclosed that the FDA had issued a CRL regarding the Company’s resubmitted NDA for OLC, identifying the “same third-party manufacturing deficiencies that were identified in the previous CRL issued in June 2025.”

    On this news, Unicycive’s stock price fell $3.01, or 39.1%, to close at $4.69 per share on June 30, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

    What Is The Lawsuit About?

    The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company had not inspected its third-party manufacturing vendor’s facility or otherwise audited the facility’s compliance with current good manufacturing practices; (2) that, as a result, the Company lacked a reasonable basis to believe that the vendor had resolved the FDA’s cited deficiencies; (3) that there was an undisclosed risk that the FDA would require additional information about the vendor’s facility’s manufacturing practices; (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, the regulatory approval of OLC was reasonably likely to be delayed; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

    Submit Your Information

    © 2026 The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz. A Professional Services Corporation.
    Website Designed & Developed By ITIFFY Consultants.